|Mushrooms vs. Meat||09/20/17|
|Good news for GERD sufferers||09/14/17|
|Reseal the bag||09/06/17|
|Low-carb beats low-cal (except when it isn't)||08/30/17|
|The power of movie tie-ins||08/23/17|
|Diet sodas may still increase your risk of diabetes||08/16/17|
|Fight hunger - with chewing gum||08/09/17|
|Should you eat more frequently? Probably not||07/26/17|
|Drink coffee, live longer||07/19/17|
|Which fats are linked with diabetes risk?||07/12/17|
|Low fat diets may actually be bad for you||07/05/17|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
How to calculate the Body Mass Index of an athletic man?
Dear Dr. Gourmet, Could you please tell me how I can calculate the Body Mass Index of my husband? He is an athletic person with a muscular body and you have said that the regular Body Mass Index would not apply to people like him.
Body Mass Index and Risk of Death
The media talk about "the epidemic of obesity" in terms one might associate more with a zombie apocalypse and the immediate destruction of civilization as we know it, so if you're a little tired of hearing about it, that's understandable. It's the media's job to grab your attention, after all.
How Much Should You Weigh?
There's a disconnect these days between what people weigh and what they think they ought to weigh. There are a few ways to look at what your best weight should be, but Body Mass Index (BMI) is one of the most reliable measures we have to help you know what a healthy weight is for you.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
It's not news that Body Mass Index (BMI) is not a perfect predictor of health or longevity. Indeed, I see at least one article a week reporting the demise of BMI's clinical relevance with a gleefulness usually reserved for reports of celebrities embarrassing themselves in some way. The fact is that way back in 2013 I reported on a study that found that those with a BMI in the overweight range were actually 8% less likely to die from any cause than those with a normal BMI. This is what's known as "the obesity paradox" - when being overweight is associated with a lower risk of death from all causes.
The problem with Body Mass Index is that it is an indirect measure of body fat. It's cheaper, quicker, and requires far less training to do a mathematical calculation than to measure someone's body fat with a fair degree of accuracy. The second problem is that it was invented to be used on a large scale: Ancel Keys, who coined the term "Body Mass Index" in the early 70's, found it useful for large populations, but not so for individuals (he himself was fairly short but muscular, so he had a higher BMI than what would be considered "normal").
The good news is that recently a team of researchers in Canada were able to look at the relationship between Body Mass Index, actual body fat, and all-cause mortality (Ann Int Med 2016: doi:10.7326/M15-1181). They made use of population health data maintained by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy of the University of Manitoba, and focused on those patients (about 49,500 women and 5,000 men) who had undergone Bone Mineral Density tests, which are the same types of tests used to measure body fat. The authors were then able to compare both the BMI and actual body fat measurements of those who died during the followup period with those who did not.
After taking into account the presence of such conditions as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, kidney disease, and congestive heart failure, the authors found that those women with a low BMI (less than 22.5) were 44% more likely to die of any cause than those with a BMI between 25 and 27.5 (usually considered slightly overweight). On the other hand, those with a percentage of body fat in the highest quintile (more than 38%) were 19% more likely to die of any cause. Results were similar for men, with low BMI and high body fat being associated with greater risk of mortality.
The authors note that the vast majority of their subjects were white, middle-aged, and female, so they suggest caution in generalizing these results to other ethnicities or age groups. They do point out that their results suggest that BMI might be a better indicator of lean body mass rather than body fat, so it "may be an inappropriate surrogate for adiposity." As I said in that 2013 Health & Nutrition Bite, we doctors deal in percentages: higher Body Mass Index still means an increased risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease. Your doctor should be looking not just at your Body Mass Index, but at you as a whole person, including your lab test scores, diet, physical activity, and personal and family history.
First posted: March 9, 2016