|Beans reduce insulin response||11/15/17|
|Warfarin may help prevent cancer||11/08/17|
|Most satisfying: dark or milk chocolate?||11/01/17|
|Portion size more important than turning off the TV||10/25/17|
|The importance of breakfast (it's not what you think)||10/18/17|
|Diet quality matters||10/11/17|
|Coffee and your heart||10/04/17|
|Get your exercise||09/27/17|
|Mushrooms vs. Meat||09/20/17|
|Good news for GERD sufferers||09/14/17|
|Reseal the bag||09/06/17|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Out of Arm's Reach
Oh, those office candy dishes. I have so many patients who have told me that their downfall is the little bowl of candy kept on their desk - or that of a colleague. Even if the dish isn't on their own desk, they tell me, every time they walk past that dish they just can't resist taking a candy or two.
Halloween Candy Is Your Friend: Really!
Halloween is one of my favorite times of the year, but the challenge is that there's always a lot of leftover candy. Having all those sweets around the office can be tempting, and it's pretty easy to rack up a ton of extra calories at this time of year. You can, however, make the season work for you.
Taking Weight Loss Supplements Could Backfire
Losing weight is not easy. Even for those who don't have significant obstacles to weight loss, like those taking certain medications or with certain conditions, it takes a certain amount of discipline to watch portion size, make healthier choices (most of the time), and exercise faithfully. So I understand why people want to take weight-loss supplements.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
Last week we talked about how a little bit of effort - specifically, walking about 6 feet - made study participants eat fewer chocolate candies than having the bowl of candy on the participants' desk. In a study in the journal Appetite (2013;71:89-94), researchers in Switzerland took the study idea and ran with it: how small did the effort need to be to affect intake? They created 3 different studies to assess the effects of different types of effort on intake.
The first study used chocolate candies in three different conditions: first, identical candies were presented in individual foil wrappers and the test subject was instructed to eat as many candies as they wanted, putting the used wrappers in a bin. Second, the same wrapped candies were used but the participants were told to leave the empty wrappers on the table. Finally, in the third condition the candies were presented unwrapped. The participants ate significantly more candies when the candies were unwrapped than when the candies were wrapped, but it didn't appear to matter whether the wrappers were left on the table or put in a bin.
But leaving the wrappers on the table reminds you of how many you've eaten, the researchers noted. So they created study number 2, which used candies in a clear overwrap, unwrapped candies that the participant was required to pick up with tongs before eating, and unwrapped candies they could pick up with their fingers. Once again, the participants ate far more unwrapped candies that were picked up with the fingers than the candies they had to unwrap or pick up with tongs.
Okay, so it appears that more effort led to eating fewer chocolates. What if the food in question wasn't something that was considered "unhealthy?" Would effort then make a difference? For the third study they added dried apricots to the test items, resulting in four conditions: unwrapped chocolate candies to be eaten with the fingers, unwrapped candies to be picked up with tongs, unwrapped dried apricots to be eaten with the fingers, and unwrapped dried apricots to be picked up with tongs. As you might expect, all of the participants ate more of the apricots than the candy. Yet the participants still ate significantly more when they could pick up the food with their fingers.
Knowing that a little more effort to obtain the food can result in eating less can be applied to your life in two ways: first, think of ways to make eating less healthy items a more effortful experience. This might mean always using utensils or taking the time to put a portion onto a plate or in a bowl rather than eating directly out of the package. Second, make eating healthier foods easier to eat. Buying prewashed salad greens is more expensive than washing and cutting your own (especially if you don't use it all before it goes bad), but it reduces the effort needed to make yourself a salad. Similarly, keeping a favorite fruit or vegetable on hand in a ready to eat form (pre-peeled carrots come to mind) can make it easier to choose that quick, healthy snack.
First posted: September 25, 2013