|Mushrooms vs. Meat||09/20/17|
|Good news for GERD sufferers||09/14/17|
|Reseal the bag||09/06/17|
|Low-carb beats low-cal (except when it isn't)||08/30/17|
|The power of movie tie-ins||08/23/17|
|Diet sodas may still increase your risk of diabetes||08/16/17|
|Fight hunger - with chewing gum||08/09/17|
|Should you eat more frequently? Probably not||07/26/17|
|Drink coffee, live longer||07/19/17|
|Which fats are linked with diabetes risk?||07/12/17|
|Low fat diets may actually be bad for you||07/05/17|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Not all fats are created equal
If you've been following Dr. Gourmet for a while, you probably recall that dairy products are not a huge part of a Mediterranean-style diet. Most dairy intake is in the form of cheeses and yogurt - fermented dairy - and not in drinking milk. I (and many other doctors) have advised people for years to choose lower-fat versions of these foods as much as they can. (I usually add the exception of small amounts of full-fat cheeses used carefully, for maximum impact in a recipe.)
Not all fats....
When it comes to diet and nutrition, I can understand why people look for simple answers. It's much easier to say "avoid carbohydrates," or "don't eat wheat products," or "all fat is bad" or even "all oils are bad" than to remember to eat fish several times a week, remember which are the best fish, and also keep in mind how much fish is the right amount.
Can Red Meat be Part of a Cholesterol-Lowering Diet?
Red meat consumption has been linked with poor cholesterol scores, breast, colon and rectal cancers, increased risk of diabetes and other chronic diseases. For a long time when I talked to my patients about eating healthier they would immediately tell me that they would stop eating red meat. This is because in the past, all red meats, including beef, lamb, pork, venison and buffalo, have been largely lumped together as all being equally bad for you.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
A few months ago the big news in nutrition (at least, as far as the national media is concerned) was that not all saturated fat is bad for you. We wrote about two studies that looked at different types of saturated fat: one discussing very-long-chain saturated fatty acids (a certain type of saturated fat), and another looked at the risk of diabetes associated with greater intake of high-fat dairy products and higher-fat unprocessed meats.
The latter research, while long term, relied on the participants to accurately report their diets - then assumed that their diets would remain the same throughout the study. While it's reasonable to believe that people tend to eat about the same things over time - we are creatures of habit, to be sure - as a research method it is not nearly as powerful as, say, yearly dietary questionnaires. Nor is it nearly as powerful as simply providing all of the participants' food for a period of time.
That's quite expensive, however, and of necessity that type of research is usually limited to small groups of subjects, as in today's study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2015;102:573-81). A team in Denmark recruited 14 overweight, postmenopausal women to participate in their feeding study. Each participant was provided with all meals and snacks for two weeks, in amounts designed to maintain their body weight. They were randomly assigned to one of three types of diets. Two of the diets were higher in saturated fat, while a third diet was lower in fat, as follows:
A CHEESE diet, in which they consumed 36% of their energy from fats (half of that in saturated fat), 49% of their energy from carbohydrates, and 15% from protein. Half of the fats came from high-fat cheese.
A MEAT diet, with 36% of energy from fat (also half of that in saturated fat), 49% of energy from carbohydrates, and 15% from protein. Half of the fats came from high-fat processed and unprocessed meats.
A CARB (low-fat) diet, with 23% of energy from fat (also half in saturated fat), 60% of energy from carbohydrates, and 15% from protein. This diet did not include any dairy products but did include lean meats.
After two weeks (known to be the amount of time to see dietary changes in cholesterol levels), the participants showed no change in their weight, waist or hip circumference, or blood pressure. Those who followed the CHEESE diet improved their HDL cholesterol (the good cholesterol) by 5% over the (low-fat) CARB diet, while those on the MEAT diet improved their HDL by 8% over the CARB diet. There were otherwise no significant differences between the three diets in total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol (the bad cholesterol).
One thing that concerns me about this study is that the researchers do not specify the types of meat consumed in the MEAT diet. It is simply described as "high-fat processed and unprocessed meats," although the study does mention beef and pork. By comparison, the authors describe the CHEESE diet as including half Danbo cheese (a popular local cheese containing 27% fat by weight) and half cheddar (33% fat by weight). Another limitation, as I mentioned, is the relatively short duration of the study: while 2 weeks are enough to see the types of changes they were investigating, a longer term study that included many more people would provide more insight into the effects of the saturated fats from the respective specific sources. What we can conclude from this study is that demonizing a particular nutrient - or even a particular food - is not the answer. High-quality food sources, eaten in moderate amounts, is the most reasonable, and the most personally sustainable, solution to a healthy diet.
First posted: September 2, 2015