|Beans reduce insulin response||11/15/17|
|Warfarin may help prevent cancer||11/08/17|
|Most satisfying: dark or milk chocolate?||11/01/17|
|Portion size more important than turning off the TV||10/25/17|
|The importance of breakfast (it's not what you think)||10/18/17|
|Diet quality matters||10/11/17|
|Coffee and your heart||10/04/17|
|Get your exercise||09/27/17|
|Mushrooms vs. Meat||09/20/17|
|Good news for GERD sufferers||09/14/17|
|Reseal the bag||09/06/17|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Satisfaction no longer an excuse
You've probably heard that you should eat slowly to give your body time to signal you when you're full. This is called "alimentary alliesthesia" (you don't need to remember it; there won't be a quiz). Another mechanism that helps your body control how much you eat is called "sensory-specific satiety". This term describes how eating a lot of the same kind of food will make it taste less good to you over the short term.
Yes, chocolate IS different for men and women
The effect of food stimuli and the resulting feeling of satisfaction (or "satiety") in the brain can actually be observed by performing Medical Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans on the brain. While sex differences in eating behavior have been documented, most research on brain activation related to eating has been limited to men only or have lumped men and women together.
Fiber for Breakfast Keeps You Satisfied
Recently researchers in Sweden compared the effects on appetite and satiety of eating rye porridge for breakfast or a similar number of calories of whole wheat bread (Phys Beh doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.023). Why rye porridge? When rye grains are processed into whole grain rye flakes for porridge the grains retain some of their original structure, leaving the resulting porridge very high in fiber.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
We don't exactly know how the feeling of hunger is caused in the body. One theory, first formulated in the 1950's, is that low levels of glucose in the brain are a cause of the feeling of hunger and the increase in appetite that goes along with it. More recent theories expand on that theory by speculating that it's the changes in blood glucose levels that lead to the feeling of hunger. Even more recently, studies have indicated that the sharp fall in blood glucose levels, caused by drinking a high-glycemic beverage, made the test subjects involved choose to eat again sooner than if they had drunk a low-glycemic beverage, which makes blood glucose levels fall more gradually.
A study published recently in the journal Appetite (2008;50:215-222) looked at their subjects' feelings of satiety as well as their feelings of hunger after high-GI and low-GI meals. The fourteen subjects for this study were overweight and obese women between the ages of 25 and 60 who did not smoke and were otherwise healthy.
Because each person's blood glucose levels will react a little differently to various foods, the scientists sought to standardize each subjects' post-meal blood glucose levels in one of two ways: to imitate a high-GI meal, each woman was given a large glucose beverage to drink all at once after a standardized breakfast and lunch. To imitate a low-GI meal, each woman was given the same amount of glucose beverage after the standardized breakfast and lunch, but they drank equal, small portions of it every 20 minutes. Note that each woman received the same amount of the glucose beverage - the only difference was how long it took to drink it.
Each woman had their blood drawn every hour after each meal in order to test their blood glucose levels, and every 20 minutes they were asked to describe how hungry they felt and how much they felt they could eat if they were to eat. The researchers found that drinking the single, large glucose beverage - the high-GI meal - led to greater feelings of hunger than the smaller, more frequent glucose beverages (the low-GI meal).
While I am not all that convinced that the Glycemic Index is the perfect way to look at foods, as some suggest, it is a good tool to consider whether an ingredient might be better from the standpoint of being higher in fiber and better for you. What I do find interesting is that the subjects ate the same number of calories over the course of their standardized meals plus their glucose beverages - the only difference is that those calories were consumed all at once or spaced out over time. This would support the idea that healthy snacks between meals might be a good way to help you manage your appetite so that you don't arrive starving at every meal and eat more than you really need.
First posted: March 12, 2008